Art Gallery CRM · Buyer's Guide

How to Choose an Art Gallery CRM: The 12-Point Checklist

Art Gallery CRM Team · Last updated: October 28, 2026 · 9 min read

Short answer: judge every gallery CRM against twelve points — art data model, proposals, multi-location, client portal, API, data ownership, EU/GDPR hosting, roles, audit trail, reporting, migration, true cost. For each point there is one question to ask the vendor and one red flag that should end the conversation. This page lists all twelve, ends with a copyable checklist, and works with any vendor — including us.

The honest way to choose an art gallery CRM is to score every candidate against the same twelve points and let demonstrations — not brochures — decide. Each point below has the question to put to the vendor, word for word, and the red flag that means trouble. The method is vendor-neutral: it works on Artlogic, on vertical suites, on an Odoo build, and on us. Where our own platform answers a point, we say so and name the module — check us the same way you check everyone else.

The twelve points

1. An art-specific data model

A gallery system must hold provenance, certificates, editions and condition as structured records on the artwork — not as text in a notes field. Everything else in the system depends on this foundation.

2. Proposal generation from the catalogue

Offers are a gallery's daily output. They should assemble from real records — images, prices, availability — and become a branded PDF without leaving the system.

3. Multi-location stock

Works travel: two spaces, a storage facility, a fair booth. The system must know where every piece is now and record the movement.

4. A client-facing portal

Collectors increasingly expect a private page for their offer, not a PDF thread. The portal should present branded offer pages the gallery controls.

5. An open API

Your CRM must talk to your website, your accounting, your tools. The strongest sign of a real API is that the vendor's own product runs on it.

6. Data and code ownership

Your catalogue is your gallery's capital. It should live in a standard format you can leave with — and the platform should not hold it hostage.

7. Hosting and GDPR

Collector records are personal data. Residency, backups and access discipline are legal questions, not features — EU hosting deserves its own scrutiny.

8. Roles and permissions

Assistants, registrars, partners and directors should not share one login. Permissions should be granular enough to hide prices from some eyes and nothing else from others.

9. A full audit trail

When a price changes or a record disappears, "who did what, when" must be answerable in seconds. This is what makes multi-user work trustworthy.

10. Reporting and dashboards

Every gallery reviews the same few numbers monthly: sales, stock ageing, pipeline, fair performance. Those views should be configurable without a developer.

11. Migration — the honest scoping

Moving from Excel or another system is a cleaning project, not a miracle. A serious vendor scopes it from a sample of your real file before promising anything.

12. True cost — the three-year number

Licence, seats, storage, image tiers, support, migration, exit: the real price is the sum over three years, not the monthly headline. Our cost guide walks the full computation.

The checklist, copyable

  • Art-specific data model — provenance, certificates, editions as structured records
  • Proposal generation — branded PDFs assembled from the catalogue, live in demo
  • Multi-location stock — real locations and traced movements, not a text field
  • Client portal — private offer pages in production, not on a roadmap
  • Open API — the same one the vendor's own product runs on, documented
  • Data and code ownership — standard format, full export, no lock-in
  • EU/GDPR hosting — named region, backup schedule, named access policy
  • Roles and permissions — granular, proven by a live login
  • Audit trail — who changed what, when, previous value
  • Reporting and dashboards — configurable without a developer
  • Migration — scoped from your real file, validated with your team
  • True cost — the year-three total including seats, storage, support and exit

How Art Gallery CRM answers these twelve

For transparency — and because a checklist should be applied to its author — our answers, each mapped to a module running in production:

Verify all of it live in a demo — that is the point of the method. If you are still mapping the market, start with the six-category 2026 comparison; if you are leaving a specific tool, see the honest Artlogic alternatives review and the spreadsheet-to-CRM migration guide.

FAQ

What should I look for in an art gallery CRM?

Twelve things: an art-specific data model (provenance, certificates, editions), PDF proposal generation from the catalogue, multi-location stock, a client-facing portal, an open API, data and code ownership, GDPR-compliant EU hosting, roles and permissions, a full audit trail, reporting dashboards, a migration plan, and the real three-year cost. For each point, ask the vendor for a live demonstration on your own data — and walk away if the answer is a roadmap.

Which questions should I ask a CRM vendor?

One per criterion, always asking for a demonstration rather than a statement: show one artwork's provenance, certificates and editions; assemble an offer and generate the PDF live; move a work between two locations; show who changed a price and when; state where the servers and backups physically are; and quote the total year-three cost including seats, storage, support and exit. Vague or deferred answers are themselves the answer.

Do galleries need a custom CRM?

Not necessarily — they need a CRM that fits how a gallery actually works. A generic CRM fails on art-specific jobs: provenance, editions, certificate records, offers assembled from the catalogue. That fit can come from a vertical SaaS, or from a platform purpose-built on a customisable base such as Odoo. What matters is not custom for its own sake, but whether the twelve points in this checklist are covered in production today, not on a roadmap.

How long does it take to evaluate a gallery CRM properly?

A focused afternoon per shortlisted vendor is enough: run your three most repeated tasks — usually sending an offer, checking availability and updating a record — through a trial with a real artwork and a real collector, and ask the twelve questions. Most galleries can move from shortlist to decision in two to three weeks without rushing the trial.

Next reads: the six-category 2026 comparison, Artlogic alternatives reviewed honestly, spreadsheets vs a gallery CRM, and the full module-by-module comparison.

Every artwork, every collector, one workspace

Bring the checklist to the demo — hold us to all twelve points.

Book a private demo

or write to [email protected]